Record Status This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database. Citation Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. Keratoprosthesis for the treatment of severe bilateral cornea disease. Edmonton: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR). Technote TN 27. 2001 Authors' objectives <p>This report summarises the available literature on keratoprosthesis (KPro), an artificial cornea, as a treatment for adult patients with severe cornea disease.</p>
Authors' conclusions The rational for using KPro is that patients reciving corneal transplantation show variable success rates and a minority of conditions where corneal transplantation will certainly fail requires an alternative strategy. KPro may offer the only hope of usable vision for patients diagnosed with ocular cicatrial pemphigoid, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, end-stage dry eyes, severe chemical burns and those with repeated failure of corneal transplantation. Whenever a standard corneal transplantation has a reasonable chance of success, a KPro is clearly not indicated.
No controlled clinical trials have been conducted for KPro because this procedure is the last option for the restoration of some visual function for a very small, specific group of patients. Limited data in the literature have shown that KPro surgery using different devices could, if performed carefully, restore some level of vision for a short or long period of time for patients, depending upon their preoperative diagnosis.
The major problem with this procedure is that serious postoperative complications are very common. There is insufficient evidence to prove the safety and efficacy of any KPro model, and as KPro models keep evolving, these new versions have not yet been proven in clinical trials with sufficient follow-up and patient numbers.
The procedure has only been performed in a few eye centres around the world using different KPro models. Currently there is no consensus in the literature on optimal device and implantation technique, and no accepted standard for this procedure. In general, KPro surgery is complicated, has a narrow safety margin, and requires intensive follow-up, thus a conservative approach is currently recommended by the eye specialists in the area.
Indexing Status Subject indexing assigned by CRD MeSH Cornea /surgery; Corneal Diseases /surgery; Prostheses and Implants; Prosthesis Implantation Language Published English Country of organisation Canada English summary An English language summary is available. Address for correspondence 1200, 10405 Jasper Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T5J 3N4. Tel: +1 780 448 4881; Fax: +1 780 448 0018 Email: djuzwishin@ihe.ca AccessionNumber 32001000940 Date bibliographic record published 27/07/2001 Date abstract record published 27/07/2001 |