| |
| A randomised trial of the effect and cost-effectiveness of early intensive multifactorial therapy on 5-year cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with screen-detected type 2 diabetes: the Anglo-Danish-Dutch Study of Intensive Treatment in People with Screen-Detected Diabetes in Primary Care (ADDITION-Europe) study |
| Simmons RK, Borch-Johnsen K, Lauritzen T, Rutten GEHM, Sandbaek A, Van den Donk M, Black JA, Tao L, Wilson ECF, Davies MJ, Khunti K, Sharp SJ, Wareham NJ, Griffin SJ |
|
|
| |
Record Status This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database. Citation Simmons RK, Borch-Johnsen K, Lauritzen T, Rutten GEHM, Sandbaek A, Van den Donk M, Black JA, Tao L, Wilson ECF, Davies MJ, Khunti K, Sharp SJ, Wareham NJ, Griffin SJ. A randomised trial of the effect and cost-effectiveness of early intensive multifactorial therapy on 5-year cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with screen-detected type 2 diabetes: the Anglo-Danish-Dutch Study of Intensive Treatment in People with Screen-Detected Diabetes in Primary Care (ADDITION-Europe) study. Health Technology Assessment 2016; 20(64) Authors' objectives To quantify the cost-effectiveness of intensive multifactorial treatment of screen-detected diabetes.
Intensive treatment (IT) of cardiovascular risk factors can halve mortality among people with established type 2 diabetes but the effects of treatment earlier in the disease trajectory are uncertain. Authors' conclusions Compared with RC, IT was associated with modest increases in prescribed treatment, reduced levels of risk factors and non-significant reductions in cardiovascular events, microvascular complications and death over 5 years. IT did not adversely affect patient-reported outcomes. IT was not cost-effective but might be if delivered at a reduced cost. The lower than expected event rate, heterogeneity of intervention delivery between centres and improvements in general practice diabetes care limited the achievable differences in treatment between groups. Further follow-up to assess the legacy effects of early IT is warranted. Indexing Status Subject indexing assigned by CRD MeSH Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Mass Screening; Primary Health Care; Secondary Prevention Language Published English Country of organisation England English summary An English language summary is available. Address for correspondence NETSCC, Health Technology Assessment, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton, SO16 7NS UK Tel: +44 23 8059 5586 Email: hta@hta.ac.uk AccessionNumber 32016000969 Date abstract record published 31/08/2016 |
| |
|
|