PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews
Is the lateral position a safe and useful method for basic airway management in trauma?
Per Kristian Hyldmo, Gunn E. Vist, Eldar Søreide, Mårten Sandberg, Leif Kåre Rognås, Vidar Magnusson, Anders Chr. Feyling
Citation
Per Kristian Hyldmo, Gunn E. Vist, Eldar Søreide, Mårten Sandberg, Leif Kåre Rognås, Vidar Magnusson, Anders Chr. Feyling. Is the lateral position a safe and useful method for basic airway management in trauma? .
PROSPERO
2012:CRD42012001190
Available from http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42012001190
Review question(s)
Lying supine/on back when unconscious / with reduced level of consciousness / in coma /not awake, may this result in loss of (patient) airway or lead to hypoxia and /or hyperventilation?
Given an existing spinal (cord) injury, will changing the patient’s position from supine to lateral (as in lateral/recovery position or log roll) worsen the spinal injury?
1. After search completed all titles and abstracts will be reviewed by two independent reviewers; the principal investigator will review all, which totals six pairs (seven investigators). Discrepancies will be solved by discussion between the two reviewers; if not solved a third independent reviewer will be asked.
2. The full text articles included in step 1 will be reviewed in similar fashion.
3. All included (and some important excluded) articles will be reviewed regarding relevant references which will be entered through step 1.
4. Remaining articles will be evaluated regarding risk of bias using Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, each outcome evaluated separately if appropriate. RevMan software will be used.
5. GRADE methodology will be used for other evaluation, using GradePro software.
From each study we will extract: Author(s), publication year, journal, study type, context, no. of patients, patient details, intervention type and comparison, outcome parameters as described.
Risk of bias (quality) assessment
We will be using Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, each outcome evaluated separately if appropriate. RevMan software will be used.
Strategy for data synthesis
Data will be aggregated for quantitative synthesises if possible, using RevMan and random effect models.
Analysis of subgroups or subsets
If applicable subgroup analysis dead vs alive, adults vs children.
Dissemination plans
The systematic review will be sought published in international, peer-reviewed medical journal.
Contact details for further information
Per Kristian Hyldmo
Sorlandet Hospital
Postboks 416
4604 Kristiansand
NORWAY
pkh@sshf.no
Organisational affiliation of the review
Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation
www.norskluftambulanse.no
Review team
Dr Per Kristian Hyldmo, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation Dr Gunn E. Vist, Norwegian Knowledge Center for the Health Services Professor Eldar Søreide, University of Bergen, Norway Professor Mårten Sandberg, University of Oslo, Norway Dr Leif Kåre Rognås, University of Århus, Denmark Dr Vidar Magnusson, Emergency Medical Services, University Hospital of Reykjavik, Iceland Dr Anders Chr. Feyling, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Norway
Anticipated or actual start date
13 February 2012
Anticipated completion date
01 February 2013
Funding sources/sponsors
The review is part of PhD project. The principal investigator (PKH) is employed (50%) by the Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation. The other investigators do this as part of their employment in their universities / organizations.
Conflicts of interest
Intellectual conflict of interest: PKH developed the LTP method, no economical interest. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Language
English
Country
Norway
Subject index terms status
Subject indexing assigned by CRD
Subject index terms
Airway Management; Humans; Patient Positioning; Patient Safety; Wounds and Injuries
Date of registration in PROSPERO
19 September 2012
Date of publication of this revision
19 September 2012
Stage of review at time of this submission
Started
Completed
Preliminary searches
Yes
Piloting of the study selection process
Formal screening of search results against eligibility criteria
Data extraction
Risk of bias (quality) assessment
Data analysis
Prospective meta-analysis
PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites.