PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews
Antithrombotic agents for the prevention of stroke and other thrombotic events in patients with atrial fibrillation
Kasandra Gauthier, Annie Bai, Kristen Moulton, Carolyn Spry, George Wells, Doug Coyle, Chris Cameron, Trevor Richter
Citation
Kasandra Gauthier, Annie Bai, Kristen Moulton, Carolyn Spry, George Wells, Doug Coyle, Chris Cameron, Trevor Richter. Antithrombotic agents for the prevention of stroke and other thrombotic events in patients with atrial fibrillation.
PROSPERO
2012:CRD42012002721
Available from http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42012002721
Review question(s)
How do the clinical safety and efficacy of new oral anticoagulants compare to warfarin, ASA, clopidogrel, or ASA + clopidogrel in preventing morbidity and mortality in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation? Are there any differences in clinical safety and efficacy depending on the dose of ASA?
In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, what is the impact on the clinical safety and efficacy of new oral anticoagulants of the following: CHADS2 score, time spent in the therapeutic range (applicable only to warfarin), age, weight, renal function, history of gastrointestinal bleed, concurrent use of antiplatelet agents (when on oral anticoagulants) or NSAIDs?
What is the cost-effectiveness, from a public payer's perspective, of new oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin, ASA, clopidogrel or ASA + clopidogrel in preventing morbidity and mortality in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
What is the cost-effectiveness, from a public payer's perspective, of new oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin, ASA, clopidogrel or ASA + clopidogrel in preventing morbidity and mortality in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation based on the CHADS2 score?
Searches
Published literature was identified by searching the following bibliographic databases: MEDLINE (1946- ) with in-process records and daily updates via Ovid; Embase (1974- ) via Ovid; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via Ovid; and PubMed. Methodological filters were applied to limit retrieval to randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials. Retrieval was limited to English language articles and studies published after 1988. Conference abstracts were excluded from the search results. The initial search was completed on June 7, 2012. Regular alerts have been established.
Types of study to be included
Inclusion criteria:
Published RCTs
Exclusion criteria:
Studies in languages other than English
Non-randomized studies
Condition or domain being studied
Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, and is associated with high morbidity and mortality, much of which is due to thromboembolism, especially ischemic stroke. Therefore, preventing these events with antithrombotic strategies is an important part of managing atrial fibrillation patients.
Participants/ population
Inclusion criteria: individuals with non-valvular AF requiring anticoagulation (including all risk levels and regardless of any comorbidities).
Intervention(s), exposure(s)
Inclusion criteria:
Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg BID
Dabigatran 110 mg or 150 mg BID
Rivaroxaban 20 mg OD
ASA
Clopidogrel 75 mg OD
Dose-adjusted Vitamin K Antagonist (warfarin and acenocoumarol)
Ischemic/uncertain stroke or systemic embolism (including myocardial infarction)
Life-threatening bleeds
Extracranial hemorrhage
Minor bleeds
Pulmonary embolism
Transient ischemic attacks
Non-cardiovascular mortality
Data extraction, (selection and coding)
Studies were included if they met the inclusion criteria listed in the pre-specified review protocol. Article selection was performed by two independent review authors in a standardized manner. Any uncertainties were resolved by discussion and consensus.
Risk of bias (quality) assessment
Findings will be interpreted in light of the heterogeneity of the individual studies (differences in design, study populations, interventions or exposures, and outcome measures) and the validity assessment of the included trials.
Strategy for data synthesis
The clinical and economic assessments will be performed by indirect/mixed treatment comparisons, with the use of a network meta-analysis.
Analysis of subgroups or subsets
CHADS2 score
Time in Therapeutic Range
Age
Weight
Renal function
History of GI bleed
Concurrent use of antiplatelet agents (when on oral anticoagulants) or NSAID
Prior Vitamin K Antagonist use
Type of atrial fibrillation
Dissemination plans
Essential messages from the review will be communicated through knowledge mobilization activities.
Contact details for further information
Trevor Richter
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH)
600-865 Carling Avenue
Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5S8
trevorr@cadth.ca
Organisational affiliation of the review
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH)
www.cadth.ca
Review team
Mrs Kasandra Gauthier, CADTH Dr Annie Bai, CADTH Mrs Kristen Moulton, CADTH Mrs Carolyn Spry, CADTH Dr George Wells, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario Dr Doug Coyle, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario Mr Chris Cameron, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario Dr Trevor Richter, CADTH
Details of any existing review of the same topic by the same authors
Wells et al. Safety, Effectiveness, and Cost-Effectiveness of New Oral Anticoagulants Compared with Warfarin in Preventing Stroke and Other Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. CADTH, 2012. Online: www.cadth.ca/media/pdf/NOAC_Therapeutic_Review_final_report.pdf
Anticipated or actual start date
10 May 2012
Anticipated completion date
01 April 2013
Funding sources/sponsors
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH)
The review protocol will soon be published on the CADTH website.
Date of registration in PROSPERO
27 July 2012
Date of publication of this revision
27 July 2012
Stage of review at time of this submission
Started
Completed
Preliminary searches
No
Piloting of the study selection process
Formal screening of search results against eligibility criteria
Data extraction
Risk of bias (quality) assessment
Data analysis
Prospective meta-analysis
PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites.