PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews
Do we need a biopsy of both the neuroendocrine tumour primary and liver metastases for the treatment decision of liver metastases? A systematic review
Stephan Arigoni, Stefan Ignjatovic, Nigel Heaton, Laura Tang, Ramon Salazar, Ashley Grossman, Cornelis Dejong, Gregory Gores, Milo Puhan, Andrea Frilling, Mickael Lesurtel, Dimitri Raptis, Stefan Breitenstein
Citation
Stephan Arigoni, Stefan Ignjatovic, Nigel Heaton, Laura Tang, Ramon Salazar, Ashley Grossman, Cornelis Dejong, Gregory Gores, Milo Puhan, Andrea Frilling, Mickael Lesurtel, Dimitri Raptis, Stefan Breitenstein. Do we need a biopsy of both the neuroendocrine tumour primary and liver metastases for the treatment decision of liver metastases? A systematic review.
PROSPERO
2012:CRD42012002651
Available from http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42012002651
Review question(s)
In patients with a primary NET and synchronous liver metastases, what is the agreement of the biopsy of the primary and the liver metastases with regards to tumour grading?
In patients with metachronous liver metastases, what is the agreement of the biopsy of the primary and the liver metastases with regards to tumour grading?
In patients with liver metastases, what is the agreement of single vs. multiple liver biopsies with regards to tumour grading?
In patients with NET liver metastases, do we need additional biopsies of the normal parenchyma to detect micrometastases?
Searches
We will search the following electronic bibliographic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)). There will be no language restrictions.
Types of study to be included
Cross-sectional and/or cohort studies.
Condition or domain being studied
Neuroendocrine liver metastases.
Participants/ population
Inclusion criteria: Patients with primary neuroendocrine tumours and/or liver metastases. Patients who underwent a biopsy of the primary and liver metastasis. Patients who underwent multiple biopsies of the liver metastases and/or healthy parenchyma. Patients aged >=18 years.
Exclusion criteria: Children or adolescents (under the age of 18 years). Studies that do not report histo-pathological biopsy results.
Intervention(s), exposure(s)
Biopsy(s) of the primary and/or liver metastases.
Comparator(s)/ control
Tumour grading of the primary vs. the metastasis. Tumour grading among the multiple liver metastases. Tumour grading of the liver metastasis vs. healthy liver parenchyma.
Outcome(s)
Primary outcomes
Agreement of grading of the primary vs. the metastasis.
Secondary outcomes
Agreement of tumour grading among the multiple liver metastases.
Agreement of tumour grading of the liver metastasis vs. healthy liver parenchyma.
Data extraction, (selection and coding)
Titles and/or abstracts of studies retrieved using the search strategy will be screened independently by two review team members to identify studies that potentially meet the inclusion criteria outlined above. The full text of these potentially eligible studies will be retrieved and independently assessed for eligibility. Any disagreement over the eligibility of particular studies will be resolved through discussion. A pre-defined protocol will be used to extract data from the included studies for assessment of study quality and evidence synthesis.
Risk of bias (quality) assessment
To grade the quality (level) of evidence and the strength of recommendations we will use the GRADE (The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/intro.htm) system to assess the final recommendations.
Strategy for data synthesis
We will provide a narrative synthesis of the findings from the included studies. A quantitative synthesis will be used if the included studies are sufficiently homogenous. We anticipate that there will be a limited scope for meta-analysis of relatively large number of studies because of the range of different outcomes measured across the small number of existing trials.
Analysis of subgroups or subsets
None planned
Dissemination plans
The results of this systematic review will be first presented at the International Consensus Conference on NET Liver Metastases (http://www.netlivermets.com/) and the submitted for consideration for publication at a peer reviewed journal.
Contact details for further information
Dimitri Raptis
University Hospital Zurich
Department of Surgery
Swiss HPB Center
Raemistrasse 100
CH-8091, Zurich
Switzerland
dimitri.raptis@usz.ch
Organisational affiliation of the review
University Hospital Zurich, Department of Surgery, Swiss HPB Center, Zurich, Switzerland
http://www.en.usz.ch/
Review team
Mr Stephan Arigoni, University of Zurich, Switzerland Mr Stefan Ignjatovic, University of Zurich, Switzerland Professor Nigel Heaton, King's College Hospital, UK Dr Laura Tang, Memorial Sloan-Kettering, USA Dr Ramon Salazar, Institut Catala d Oncologia, Spain Dr Ashley Grossman, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK Professor Cornelis Dejong, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands Professor Gregory Gores, Mayo clinic, USA Milo Puhan, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA Professor Andrea Frilling, Imperial College London, UK Professor Mickael Lesurtel, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland Dr Dimitri Raptis, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland Dr Stefan Breitenstein, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
Anticipated or actual start date
03 March 2012
Anticipated completion date
10 December 2012
Funding sources/sponsors
University Hospital Zurich, Department of Surgery, Swiss HPB Center, Zurich, Switzerland
Formal screening of search results against eligibility criteria
Data extraction
Risk of bias (quality) assessment
Data analysis
Prospective meta-analysis
PROSPERO This information has been provided by the named contact for this review. CRD has accepted this information in good faith and registered the review in PROSPERO. CRD bears no responsibility or liability for the content of this registration record, any associated files or external websites.