Is reconstruction the best management strategy for anterior cruciate ligament rupture? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus non-operative treatment
Smith TO, Postle K, Penny F, McNamara I, Mann CJ
 
 
Record Status
This is a systematic review that meets the criteria for inclusion on DARE.
Bibliographic details
Smith TO, Postle K, Penny F, McNamara I, Mann CJ. Is reconstruction the best management strategy for anterior cruciate ligament rupture? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus non-operative treatment. Knee 2014; 21(2): 462-470
PubMedID
24238648
DOI
10.1016/j.knee.2013.10.009
Indexing Status
Subject indexing assigned by NLM
MeSH
Anterior Cruciate Ligament /injuries /surgery; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction; Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafting; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Making; Humans; Joint Instability /etiology; Knee Injuries /diagnosis /therapy; Osteoarthritis, Knee /etiology; Patient Outcome Assessment; Physical Therapy Modalities; Range of Motion, Articular; Rupture /therapy; Tendons /transplantation
AccessionNumber
12013067920
Date bibliographic record published
17/12/2013
 
Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE)
Produced by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination
Copyright © 2025 University of York
 
Homepage
Options
Print
PDF
 
PubMed record
Original research
 
Share
 

Message for DARE database users