Sixteen trials (813 patients, range 20 to 120) were included in the review. All trials were judged to be of high quality. PEDro scores ranged from 4 to 8 out of 10.
Seven studies reported on sensorimotor control of the upper extremity: three found a statistically significant improvement for other (not Bobath) approaches and four found no differences between approaches.
Four studies reported on sensorimotor control of the lower extremity: two found statistically significant differences between approaches, one favoured Bobath and one favoured a motor relearning programme.
Four studies reported on balance control: two found positive results that favoured the Bobath Concept.
None of six studies that reported on dexterity found any benefit for Bobath; two found superior effects with alternative approaches.
Five studies reported sufficient data on mobility. Results appeared to depend on how mobility was assessed but generally most studies found statistically significant benefits with alternative approaches (not Bobath).
Limited results were presented for activities of daily living (four studies) and quality of life (one study).