|
Impact of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: the WHICH? (Which heart failure intervention is most cost-effective and consumer friendly in reducing hospital care) multicenter, randomized trial |
Stewart S, Carrington MJ, Marwick TH, Davidson PM, MacDonald P, Horowitz JD, Krum H, Newton PJ, Reid C, Chan YK, Scuffham PA |
|
|
Record Status This is an economic evaluation that meets the criteria for inclusion on NHS EED. Bibliographic details Stewart S, Carrington MJ, Marwick TH, Davidson PM, MacDonald P, Horowitz JD, Krum H, Newton PJ, Reid C, Chan YK, Scuffham PA. Impact of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: the WHICH? (Which heart failure intervention is most cost-effective and consumer friendly in reducing hospital care) multicenter, randomized trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2012; 60(14): 1239-1248 Indexing Status Subject indexing assigned by NLM MeSH Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Ambulatory Care /economics /statistics & Australia; Cardiovascular Agents /therapeutic use; Chronic Disease; Cohort Studies; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Failure /economics /mortality /physiopathology /therapy; Home Care Services /economics /statistics & Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Readmission /economics /statistics & Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Stroke Volume /physiology; Surveys and Questionnaires; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; numerical data; numerical data; numerical data AccessionNumber 22012038079 Date bibliographic record published 09/01/2013 |
|
|
|