To coincide with Childhood Cancer Awareness Month, we are highlighting a range of reviews that have been undertaken at CRD that focus on ameliorating the effects of the aggressive therapies used to treat childhood cancers.
Febrile neutropenia is a common and potentially life-threatening complication of treatment for childhood cancer. Work at CRD has highlighted the uncertainties around the value of biomarkers in the prediction of adverse outcomes from episodes of febrile neutropenia (Phillips 2012) and around the predictive accuracy of risk stratification clinical decision rules upon which targeted treatment decisions are based (Phillips 2010; Phillips 2012). Further work has focussed on the safety and efficacy of fluoroquinolones (Sung 2012) and has examined the effectiveness of outpatient versus inpatient management and oral versus parenteral antibiotics in children with low-risk febrile neutropenia (Manji 2012).
As with adults, chemotherapy to treat cancer in children and young people can produce nausea and vomiting. This can be extremely unpleasant and continues to be a problem despite better antiemetic drugs. A Cochrane review (Phillips 2010) assessing the effectiveness of antiemetics found that no firm conclusions can be made about which drugs are best. From the limited evidence available, 5-HT3 antagonists appear more effective than older antiemetic agents, even when those agents are combined with a steroid. Adding dexamethasone to the 5-HT3 antagonist of choice doubles the chance of complete control of acute vomiting.
The CRD Databases provide access to other critically appraised systematic reviews and economic evaluations relevant to childhood cancer. To search for these click here.
Individually tailored therapy for febrile neutropenia
Outpatient and oral antibiotic management of low risk febrile neutropenia.
Preventing chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting
Preventing chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting
Page last updated: 29 May, 2013